Quote:
|
Originally Posted by V_RocKs
80.58.3.235 - - [08/Feb/2005:22:56:16 -0800] "GET /license.php HTTP/1.0" 200 482 "http://www.me.com" "Mozilla compatible"
62.163.67.3 - - [08/Feb/2005:22:58:39 -0800] "GET /license.php HTTP/1.1" 200 494 "http://www.me.com" "Mozilla compatible"
218.108.20.242 - - [08/Feb/2005:22:59:02 -0800] "GET /license.php HTTP/1.0" 200 482 "http://www.me.com" "Mozilla compatible"
213.56.68.29 - - [08/Feb/2005:23:00:02 -0800] "GET /license.php HTTP/1.0" 200 482 "http://www.me.com" "Mozilla compatible"
201.134.119.125 - - [08/Feb/2005:23:01:15 -0800] "GET /license.php HTTP/1.1" 200 494 "http://www.me.com" "Mozilla compatible"
168.143.113.125 - - [08/Feb/2005:23:01:27 -0800] "GET /license.php HTTP/1.1" 200 494 "-" "Mozilla compatible/4.78 (TuringOS; Turing Machine; 0.0)"
I just tested 6 proxies and 5 out of 6 DO pass the referrer... Now I will run the same test with your software and see if I am just high on crack cocain.
|
They are not typical anonymous proxies then, as far as I know.
With a packet sniffer I discovered that the headers are not right when using proxies though. So you were right to begin with. I will have it straightened out and resent to all customers as soon as my C++ guy comes online.