Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Paco, of Large Cash.
I still do not understand how it is a person can try and justify something by using money as a defense ... it makes no sense to me.
I wish he had a daughter, then he may understand ... actually, scratch that ... maybe for the non-exsisting child it is better that he not cause he would most likely .. you know.
Originally Posted by punkworld
So he had sites with clothed underage girls. Big fucking deal.
What is the purpose of a clothed 'teen model' [?] and please do not try and tell me it is no different from the magazine Seventeen, cause it is.
I bet if you looked at the member database you would see 95-99% of the first names are mens, and the other few % are for dumbasses that need to use their spouses CC.
I do not have children so I am not being a protective parent.
I do not believe in the arguement 'that is how things were done in the old days' and for many good reasons, but the main one ... yah, that is because at fourteen half their life was already over (average age of death was 28-30).
|
Why is a fully clothed pic of a 15 year old wrong and a pic of an 18 year old getting double anal right?
The average teen has sex at 15, and I see no way that *fully clothed* pics of teens of that age are extremely damaging to them. Sure, it may turn out to be a stupid choice, but one they are fully capable of making. It's not like *fully clothed* pics will turn up later in their life and ruin their careers or whatever.
Hell, most 15 year old girls go to clubs and pretend to be 18. Thinking they're innocent little girls with no idea of what they're doing is being naive.