Quote:
Originally posted by Fletch XXX
The law is not going to involve Hollywood movies or anything like that, that is done in a societally accepted manor.
The photos they are speaking of, are CP, just made in Photoshop.
Everyone is so quick to say, OMG they cant pass that law, that means every blah blah blah...this movie did this, and this movie did this...well read more on how CP is measured.
For instance, Fast TImes At Ridgemont High and Phoebe Cates topless scene, this measured agaist society does NOT offend the majority.
You take an altered pic of a 12 year old online, and that would/SHOULD offend ANY "average person in society" which is HOW obscenity is measured.
Ya'd think Adult Webmasters would read more about the legalities regarding these issues, instead of voicing incorrect opinions in regards to laws that apply especially to us... eh...*sigh*
If youre against this law in ant way, a big fuck you from SoCal.
|
Sorry Fletch but I think it is you who needs to read this law a bit more.
They were not speaking of just "CP, just made in Photoshop."
The law referrs to 18+ models pretending they are younger
computer graphic images of people who do not even exists.
a bad cut and paste job of a little girls head on a grown woman's body
literary works
you could not write fictional erotic stories that involved children.
Now however distasteful it might be for someone to write a fictional erotic story involving children...should we be throwing maybe the Next Nabokov and his own attempt at Lolita into the slammer?
You say that hollywood movies are going to be done in a "societally accepted manor."
Well I think that should scare you...that society is going to get to judge what is accepted and what is not..when even in Los Angeles you better not sale a movie involving fisting.
We're not talking about anything "real" here....only fantasies...and once we start trying to legislate what goes on in the brains of our citizenry...then fuck that I'm outta here.
I'm on my way to Belize
