Quote:
|
Originally Posted by reflected-dhb
Hello, I'm an owner of reflected.net, and the ignorant flaming has gone on long enough. For those who have supported us, thank you - your kindness has not gone unnoticed. For those who sit on here all day and make things up, do some research and get your facts straight before writing.
I'll post the letter to our customers we sent in a few minutes on a separate thread, so more people see it, but since someone says we're LYING, here's some facts:
Phil Doroff, "phil21" on GFY, is named in the FTC suit as an officer of WTFRC, Inc., which is the company that sold us Reflected.net. WTFRC, Inc. is a Nevada corporation which doesn't currently do business as Reflected Networks because they sold the name, customers, and certain assets to us.
Phil is currently employed as our director of operations, but he is neither an owner nor an officer of the company. The charges against Phil and WTFRC, Inc. are NOT against me, my partner, our company (Reflected Networks, Inc. of Illinois).
We are in touch with the FTC's attorney for the case, and they understand that we are not the same company as WTFRC, Inc. in Vegas. They are NOT suing us for SPAM, pulling out our equipment, or shutting us off.
Who's lying?
Feel free to PM me with any serious questions.
DHB
daniel at reflected dot net
|
If this is the case im sincerely sorry ,
Infact i would still guess phil is just caught up in the case but not the "targets" in this case.
But you have to admit its AWFULLY shady looking..
phil is named in the charges and so is reflected net but it happens to be a different reflected.net ??
It doesn't take a rocket scientist to see the correlation.
Regardless even having an employee of your hosting company being charged by the ftc is fairly scary and worrysome for partners/customers and the way your disclaimer reads, it makes it sound as if its all just a confusion with the name , and its not.