Quote:
|
Originally Posted by SmokeyTheBear
I dont know , but i def think its very very shady that they would put a disclaimer on their front page claiming its a different reflected, even though one of the people charged is FROM GFY and promotes reflected using his reflected.net email account, offers hosting deals for reflected and is listed as an employee of reflected, and is known as phil from reflected.net.
Now im not saying they are guilty im just saying it seems shady they would lie.
|
Hello, I'm an owner of reflected.net, and the ignorant flaming has gone on long enough. For those who have supported us, thank you - your kindness has not gone unnoticed. For those who sit on here all day and make things up, do some research and get your facts straight before writing.
I'll post the letter to our customers we sent in a few minutes on a separate thread, so more people see it, but since someone says we're LYING, here's some facts:
Phil Doroff, "phil21" on GFY, is named in the FTC suit as an officer of WTFRC, Inc., which is the company that sold us Reflected.net. WTFRC, Inc. is a Nevada corporation which doesn't currently do business as Reflected Networks because they sold the name, customers, and certain assets to us.
Phil is currently employed as our director of operations, but he is neither an owner nor an officer of the company. The charges against Phil and WTFRC, Inc. are NOT against me, my partner, our company (Reflected Networks, Inc. of Illinois).
We are in touch with the FTC's attorney for the case, and they understand that we are not the same company as WTFRC, Inc. in Vegas. They are NOT suing us for SPAM, pulling out our equipment, or shutting us off.
Who's lying?
Feel free to PM me with any serious questions.
DHB
daniel at reflected dot net