View Single Post
Old 04-10-2002, 01:31 AM  
titmowse
Confirmed User
 
Industry Role:
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: TEXAS
Posts: 5,320
:2cents

"Accordingly, an erotic picture of a 25-year-old appearing to be 17 could be charged as child pornography."

that is fucking scary.


just remember kiddies, the law is a double-edged sword. no i don't like non nude. hell, there's a lotta porn i hate. but i see in this thread the same arguments that the religious right use against our industry:

1) the corellation between viewing porn and violence against women

2) the belief that thoughts equal action

3) the arrogance of one taste over another

do sickos jerk off to young girls in swim suits? of course. some sickos jerk off to 70 year old nuns in thier habits, but i don't see anyone coming to the defense of 70 year old nuns or aboriginal women in the pages of national geographic either.

the bottom line is the bottom line. if you don't like non nude, don't promote it and don't deal with those that do.
__________________
I still love everybody
titmowse is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote