cherrylula

No, but when you use your credit card to join a paysite with teenage girls posing provacatively and proceed to jerk off and fantasize about fucking them, its a little different. I agree its not necessarily "porn" because there is much skin on tv alone and that's not "porn," but where are they marketing these teen sites, and what type of people are joining, huh?

Yes fantasies are okay, but I do think that these teen fashion sites are giving the wrong message. Although "mandy" age 14 might LOOK like she wants to get fucked in her pictures, in all honesty she probably does not realize this and probably does not realize the message she is getting across to the pervs who are joining.

I'm a chick, I like to dress sexy and look cute, but at the same time there are guys out there who assume that because you dress a certain way you are sending out a certain message. I might pose nude online, but I sure as fuck don't walk around innappropriate places in sexy clothing giving guys the wrong idea..... I don't think there has been any instance of a judge letting a sex offender go because the victim was dressed in a short skirt and "she wanted to get fucked"

My point: Let kids be kids. Its wrong to exploit children like this, clothed or not. If a guy needs to jerk off to little girls, I am sure he won't have a problem doing so.... BUT DONT FUEL THE FIRE. In some countries there are cultural differences and some things are accepted differently. That is understandable. But how would you feel if your 15 year old daughter was paid a couple hundred bucks and then exploited on a teen fashion site?? I sure as hell would not allow it. For fucks sake, get her some singing lessons and enter her in star search or some shit..... sex sells but keep things in their proper place. And it is all cause and effect... maybe people really do need to boycott certain things to help stop this CP crap. Sooner or later the shit's really going to hit the fan.

Minors and porn DONT MIX.