|
Nedder, I agree totally...
But what I am more concerned about are the people who take 1000's of these photos and put them online and charge people to see them.
A mag is one thing, I read a shirt on a girl today on the cover of a mag that said "being sexy doesnt mean you have to have sex."
Yeah okay that makes a lot of sense, thats just like saying "smoke but dont inhale." Of course the mag doesnt look like a teengirl mag although it is.
Thats not what Im talking about, shit ... sex sells, always has, thats why the tactics mentioned in marketing today has become so sexual.
Im more concerned with the people who horde young girl non nude content and make paysites.
As I said the one girl is 14. Now if it was one pic on a commerical thats one thing, but this material is housed in a sexual manner and put together as a DATABASE of girls ALL IN BIKINIs and then the URl blatantly says hey, keep in mind all these girls are UNDER 18.... what else I find funny is they use the 2257 Code in regards to models being of age, which means if they ARE of age then they are play acting, and for them to say she is 14 and not be, is just as illegal if not more.
Ive calmed down a bit since my original post, but am still concerned.
This is like the 4th time for me personally to have come across a site obviously pushing the limits too far for my taste. i doubt anything will come of it as stated by 4pics.
If the battle is lost, so be it. I tried at least. It could be your daughter.
|