Quote:
|
Originally Posted by C_U_Next_Tuesday
I have not been impressed with review sites that I have been contacted from.
How ridiculous is it to put a real amateur girl site and compare it to a fake amateur girl site that some guy paid thousands of dollars for the design and pics...
Most of the reviews were negative..not for lack of or shitty content.. but just because they kept comparing sites to one another that were totally different in every way imaginable.
A review should be of that one site.. not a freaking comparison to another site..
|
This seems to be a common concern. Aside from lack of professional authoring skills, I think the main reason for poor quality reviews is the wrong incentive (on the part of the reviewer). Many 'SEO' hacks practise 'site scraping' which is sometimes veiled as a 'review' - this is nothing more than a shameless stringing of text with the subject site's keywords laced throughout a meaningless babble.
This does very little for the owner of the site, but regrettably benefits the 'reviewer'.
A proper review takes time and skill.
If the purpose of a review is to bolster the SERPs of the publisher of the review, the website reviewed is not likely to benefit much.
The reviews I'm working on are oriented to provide benefits for the site owners, their affiliates, the reviewer, and the publisher by the nature of the process and the format/distribution of the finished product.
Thanks to those who have already invited me to review their sites.
If you have a site (or cluster of sites) and would like to have it professionally reviewed please let me know.
If you are operating an affiliate program and would like to offer your affiliates some effective additional tools for promoting your site(s) without stepping all over each others' feet (duplicate content penalties are REAL on search engines), contact me.
http://DinoCortez.com/contact-us.html
Thanks and all the best for the new year!
-Dino