Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Mutt
yes and when a Chevy dealer bashes the Ford dealer it's done in private not in front of 2,000 onlookers. You had a ton of webmasters, naive ones, who totally believed that programs using NATS were 'shave proof' - which was a great thing for you - yes many webmasters are that naive, they only associate 'shaving' with a setting in the admin of the affiliate software that says 'Shave- Yes' and 'Shave - No'. As the bickering started on GFY and probably other boards I don't read you started to get people like European Lee making the obvious point that NATS doesn't make a program shave proof.
|
Chevy and Ford reach audiences of far more than 2000 in their advertising
As far as the shave thing, I've stated my standing a million times. We never came out and said it was "impossible to shave" or "shave proof" with NATS. We said we made it as hard as we knew how to screw with the numbers and that we put as many checks and balances in place for it. Now we've gone a further step in that if we ever do find a NATS program using the software in a fraudulent manner their liscense will be revoked and they will face legal action. The point we brought up in the past was that we take a stance different than a lot of the industry and some of our competition has in the past. That stance is that rather than support shaving and make it easy for the program owner to do so we have taken the opposite route of making it as hard for them to as we can and backing that up with severe consequences.
This industry is full of fly by night companies, scammers, and general scum. It should be a bright spot to see a company doing what they can to take a stand against it.