|  12-24-2004, 05:58 PM |  | 
	| Confirmed User 
				 
                                Industry Role:  Join Date: May 2004 
					Posts: 6,664
				      | 
	Quote: 
	
		| 
					Originally Posted by MaskedMan
					
				 Fact of the matter is... mpa2 had a shaving feature, every other affiliate software did as well, and got nailed on it... hard.  mpa3 is having a battle overcoming the reprecutions from that.
 NATS and mpa3 are now both rather well known for not having the shaving feature anymore.  And a lot of people talk about it and some preffer one over the other.... but they've both just been doing business.
 
 That's what it all boils down to... they both promote their own software. It's what a company does. How do you sell your software without any promotion of it?
 
 As far as I can tell, this is GFY... and people very quickly jump to assumptions and accusations. And I have seen many people question and speculate about both companies but not once have I ever seen mpa3 or nats ever mention the other company in any negative manner.
 
 If they both do their marketing promotions properly, then yes... people should talk about them. People should want to promote sponsors that use them. People SHOULD know about them. That's what promoting is all about.
 |  Well said.  Thank you   | 
	|   |           |