12-24-2004, 03:05 PM
|
|
|
vip member
Join Date: Jan 2003
Posts: 17,798
|
Interesting, maybe he charged back because he thought the site was shit?
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by iBanker
We all know how shitty chargebacks can be for both affiliates and programs the same. I would like to know what other people think about a response like this, and the possible effectiveness of it:
Dear Mr. XXXXXXXX,
You are receiving this email because of your successful attempt to chargeback a transaction made on blackdickswhitechicks.com. Your IP address of XX.XXX.XXX.XXX is an exact match based on location for XXXX XXXXX Rd, North Carolina, 28105. If you were unhappy with the service provided to you by that website, we would be happy to give you a CREDIT on the purchase, back to your checking account.
You have decided to chargeback the item instead, claiming it was a fraudulent transaction. Our systems and FIT (Fraud Investigation Team) have flagged your dispute as inaccurate. We are informing you of this in advance to try and resolve this matter amicably. We are offering you a credit on the account, which would require you to return to your bank and cancel the chargeback.
If you chose not to cancel the chargeback, and remain under the claim that this was not a valid transaction, we will peruse a fraud investigation against you through the use of our attorneys, and state and federal court. Convictions of such offenses could cost you a minimum fine of $5,000.00 and 6-12 months imprisonment.
Please work with us on this matter, and it will be solved immediately. You will have to respond to this email with your intentions for us not to peruse legal action against you.
Sincerely,
JSA Media Group, Inc.
It is sad that the people who buy from the industry have learned they can chargeback almost anything, and too often programs flirt with that upper 1% where the gray line become black. Something need to be done about it.
PS. Im new here, so hi everyone.
|
|
|
|