Do webmasters actually WANT their sites reviewed?
With all the recent threads related to website reviews I've decided to weigh in.
1) If you are a website owner (free/avs/paysite/tgp/links/??), what is your attitude towards having your site objectively reviewed?
2) If you value fair, honestly upbeat reviews, and would like to have your website(s) promoted with well-written articles, I am offering a solution from the 'other' end.
I am compiling a website review repository which will make available uniquely phrased detailed reviews of sites (no two reviews would be textually identical) to those who want to incorporate them into their bona-fide directories and web sites.
At this time, there is no fee to webmasters wanting to have their sites professionally reviewed - a link with any access info and permission is all it takes to get queued for the repository.
If you operate a bona-fide links or directory site (NO spamdex or hijacked pages) and you are interested in licensing exclusive text versions of the reviews, please contact me.
Unlike many of the other 'reviewers' currently writing individual reviews (with and without site owners permissions), I am interested in doing full workups for sites wanting to particpate in this program.
Also, I have proprietary authoring tools which facilitate the economic production of diverse (but on point and coherent) versions of text content. Once a site has been researched and reviewed, many excellent versions of the individual articles can be produced on demand.
Please check my sig for details and contact info.
Thanks,
-Dino
|