This is a joke, right? Porn for blind people?
Looks like the average age of these gals is about 35. You promise crisp and clear photos, whereas the ones you show are strangely murky. That top pic on the second page looks like she's picking herself up off the pavement after falling from the fourth floor.
You seem to have no clear concept of what market you're going after, either. You're showing ugly hags and yet bragging about cheerleaders. Cheerleaders is the teen market, but there isn't a teen in sight here.
Also, if you want the teen market, it's two-pronged: there's the innocent teen and then there's the slutty teen. The innocent teen is "sweet" and the slutty one is anything but. You have the two mixed up.
While they may not be, these images have the look and feel of BAD magazine scans. They don't look the least bit recent. I'm guessing they're at least 20 years old. Am I right?
This site will NEVER make you any money because it doesn't know what it is and therefor appeals to no one in particular.
Also, I encountered a bad link:
http://www.porn-gallery.com/showoffs...ils/1HA019.jpg