View Single Post
Old 11-22-2004, 04:46 PM  
- Jesus Christ -
Confirmed User
 
Industry Role:
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: ::::::::::::: :::::::::::||::::::::::: :::::::::::||::::::::::: :::::::::::||::::::::::: :::::::::::||::::::::::: :::::::::::||::::::::::: ::::::||||||||||||:::::: :::::::::::||::::::::::: :::::::::::||::::::::::: ::::::::::::::::::::::::
Posts: 7,197
Quote:
Originally posted by CET
You're the one obfuscating by bringing up a bunch of details that are meaningless to the discussion at hand. For example, the whole "writ of certiori" argument you tried to carry one and which I essentially ignored. Check the mirror before you accuse anyone else of something.
Dude wether that ruling is or is not constituation is not meaningless.

You brought up writ of certiori and used it incorrectly to state that it had osmthing to do wit ha supreme court ruleing.

Your a joke and anyone subjectivly reading whats gone on here knows it. Anyone who take a half hour to skim the gocument you linked will also know it. THERE IS NOTHING IN THAT RULING HTAT IS UNCONSTITUATINAL.
Quote:
Originally posted by CET
These cases are examples of laws that are clearly unconstitutional,
No... you cited ONE case... that Im reading... wich appears to be CLEARLY constituional.

You keep repeating yourself thinking it will make what you say true.
__________________

Amen

Last edited by - Jesus Christ -; 11-22-2004 at 04:50 PM..
- Jesus Christ - is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote