View Single Post
Old 11-22-2004, 04:23 PM  
- Jesus Christ -
Confirmed User
 
Industry Role:
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: ::::::::::::: :::::::::::||::::::::::: :::::::::::||::::::::::: :::::::::::||::::::::::: :::::::::::||::::::::::: :::::::::::||::::::::::: ::::::||||||||||||:::::: :::::::::::||::::::::::: :::::::::::||::::::::::: ::::::::::::::::::::::::
Posts: 7,197
Quote:
Originally posted by CET
You said, "Neither have been brought as a case before the suprme court." I provided 2 links that showed that they were brought up. I also gave a link showing where they made a decision on the Campaign Finance Reform Act. Care to keep pretending you know what the fuck your talking about?
Once again... tryign to use obfuscation and confusion to prove somthing that is untrure. I'm skmming this... perhaps you could point me to the unconstitutional paragraph??


So I was wrong... I did not follow the finfance reform case So yep I missed that. But what part of THE COURTS ruling is unconstitional?


Your grabbing at straws dude.... none of this really has anything to do with the draft. Its called obfuscation. Lawyers do that a lot. The sad thing is I think you really believe that the constitution is going to be shredded.
__________________

Amen

Last edited by - Jesus Christ -; 11-22-2004 at 04:25 PM..
- Jesus Christ - is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote