Quote:
Originally posted by xenophobic
I am afraid you are confusing two different events, the bombing of the Federal Building in
Oklahoma City, in which two American Citizens often thought to be part of a Militia, Terry Nichols and Timothy McVeigh, who made a bomb out of fertilizer were convicted.
The bombing of the World Trade Center in 1993 was in a Van parked in the car park below the building, however several of the plotters of that are already in jail serving life sentances for their part in the bombing.
Whom would you consider a reputable source on this btw?
|
A-Ha! You're right. I thought something seemed off.
Chompsky is solid for a few reasons, one - He's a linguist, entereing field to become a philosopher. Two - He uses unequivical logic. His conclusions are based on the most logcal and simple possibilities. He can retain an incredible amount of information and see the bigger picture at all times. When he speaks, it's almopst hard to stay awake cause it's like he's reading an essay.
Jean Raulston Saul - he's pretty good at taking events and drawing logical facts from them - global terms for local events
Naomi Klien (Although she can be a little hollier-than-though at times), Haroon Sidiqui
those are a few. I am particular to print rather than internet, that's my personal Bias. The BBC at times can be pretty good, so can the CBC. Before the bush administration seized power, there were a few good maistream newsmedia as well, but it looks like they've put the crunch down.
how about u?