my point:
When an affiliate is making a gallery (not using FHGs), and the referal tracker is cookie based only, his sale depends on if the surfer hit the referal links. If the surfer look at the pic, and type the watermarked URL, then the gallery maker doesnt get credit.
Now, if its only few percent it could still be lots of money in total. I know it is possible and how to set a cookie already when they enter your own made gallery, like the FHGs. Question is only if it is worth working with it.
