Quote:
Originally posted by baddog
Hmmm, just to address these to qualifiers . . . I think IBill and Enron provided those. Did that help?
|
Globill provided this information as well... NexusXi kind of did...
What's your point?
Are you suggesting that when a company refuses and gets defensive when asked to provide legal information about its registration, principles, bank and place(s) of business, that this is irrelevant because other companies which have provided this kind of information in the past have failed?
Are you serious?
My point is (although I'm not sure how repeating is really going to make a difference):
It is reasonable to consider any company which makes efforts to conceal information about itself, especially in light of all these failures, to be a high risk proposition.
BTW: bdog as you keep plugging your sponsor eCommerceGlobal in your posts - let's have all this information about them.
Does anyone else hear want to know more about eCommerceGlobal visa vi the points of due diligence I mentioned in my earlier post in this thread?
-Dino