Quote:
Originally posted by TheLegacy
maybe they are holding out for another OJ jury?
|
You mean one that will weigh only the facts presented in court rather than make up their mind based on the race of the defendent.
It's funny how most people who say OJ is guilty cannot name the orginal lead prosecutor before Marcia Clark. Because if you could name the guy then you probably know that the case was torn apart during the openning arguments. The state asked jugde Ito to grant them a second openning argument which is never allowed but they got one anyway and did so bad that the original prosecutor just fell apart.
The case was lost on he first day and it went down hill from there with a key witness(Mark Furman) finally being convicted of perjury
Get over it dude. The case was not proved and it wasn't even close. You're just stuck on the shit because you feel like some hahahahahaha got away with something.
Why don't you be so concerned about the korean grocer who shot a 15 year old girl (Latash Harlings) in the back of the head and was actually convicted by a jury only to have the judge let the killer walk out of the court with no jail time?
By the way Harlings was killed on video tape; unlike Nicole Simpson, where there is no video tape or eye witness.