Quote:
Originally posted by charly
I've been looking at a lot of these review sites recwently and very disappointed in what I found.
They all review the number of images, videos, content and quality. Speed of download, layout, site navigation, prices, exclusive content, etc.
But few of them actually review the porno aspect of the site.
The number one reason a surfer hands over $30 a month to a paysite is to jerk off. To review a paysite and not include this element in the review make it mostly useless to the surfer. It's like a restaurant critic not telling us about the taste of the food or a film critic commenting on how interesting a movie is.
The surfer wants to know the following, will the site get his dick hard, will it rip him off. The rest is add on information.
Now if the excuse is "Porn is to wide a subject to grade" or "It will appeal to someone" think of a reviewer in another industry gfiving that excuse. "Someone will enjoy eating it so we will not comment on the taste"
Reviewers. Look at the suitability of the images to the niche, if you do not understand the niche, don't review it. Look to see how fuckable the models are, how much they look like they are enjoying themselves, how much it makes you think you could of joined in. In other words how hard it will make the surfers dick.
Do this and give the other info and surfers will return to read what you advise and will take your recommendations.
|
very sound advice.
i won't go into to much detail here, but it will suffice to say i have a large fanbase that appreciates my opinions for a reason.
though i am dying to spill the beans and give more insight, i am keeping it under wraps till i am ready to debut it to stifle the copycats. my hook is mine, and i'm hogging it to myself.
