Quote:
Originally posted by theking
I have stated that the "theory" has evidence to support it (especially in the microevolution area...less in the macroevolution area)...and as "theories" go it has merit. It is still a "book" that has missing chapters. It does not reach the level with me that is required in a criminal trial..."beyond a resonable doubt"...but it does reach the level that is required in a civil trial..."preponderence of the evidence". You are free to be a staunch "believer"...it does not reach the level that I am willing to committ to it being a "belief" of mine. You seem insistent that everyone accept your "belief" of the truth of the "theory" when others of...equal or greater...intelligence are not convinced of your "belief".
|
You do understand that there are no 'facts' in science?
Not a one.
There are only theories that have not been falsified.