Quote:
|
Just what the Internet needs another marketeer who does not care if it's tits "ass" (isn't that a donkey) or vitamin pills.
|
I don't care if it's tits, ass or vitamin pills. Not everyone runs a paysite. Alot of people make there money promoting other people's paysites. Are they selling porn, yes. But ultimately they are selling traffic.
Quote:
|
The problem with the pictures the article refers to, is the girl looks like she is waiting for a bus or something even less exciting
|
What, am I the only one (besides BV
) who sees a girl on the street and wonders what kind of panty she has on, or if she is shaved. That content is gold. Yeah, amateur is a good niche, always has been. Look at ranks.sextracker.com and in the top 50 sites you will see tgp's, cjs and amateur/voyeur sites like voyeurweb, amateurweb, etc. So there is something to be said about a girl waiting for a bus or something less exciting.
Quote:
|
Plus of course if a guy is good enough to shoot for a market that pays $5,000 it makes perfect sense to sell it for $500.
|
I blame collusion amongst the photographers for letting that happen. I remember a few years ago when you HAD to buy content that cost $1-$2 a pic just because that was all there was available. Now there is more available, prices have come down. Partly because people were sick of paying so much for stuff that wasn't what they liked and decided to do it themselves. And partly because they felt by undercutting prices they could make money.
But I think you are getting two things mixed up. The print market and the internet market. They are different.