Quote:
Originally posted by Tom_PM
What the hell are you talking about exacty? I didnt offer a political preference in my post.
Also, you have some notion that there was a 3 million vote difference which may be true in the popular vote, but the difference in ohio, the deciding state, was about 140k.
So, 1 machine in 1 precinct gave 1 candidate an extra 4k votes. Doing a small amount of math would show anyone who supports any candidate that hey, thats not too cool.. lmao. Especially with 120k+ provisional ballots uncounted so far, and all the absentee ballots uncounted so far.
So if I'm pathetic, it's pathetic with doing math and wondering if indeed things will change when the final vote count is done. Guilty as charged, lmao. 
Enjoy cutting people down though if you think it's of value somehow. 
|
When did I say you offered a political preference? Anyhow, taken directly from the article: "Deducting the erroneous Bush votes from his total could not change the election's outcome, and there were no signs of other errors in Ohio's electronic machines, said Carlo LoParo, spokesman for Ohio Secretary of State Kenneth Blackwell." Where am I confusing you? I guess cutting people down is what you call pointing out that you aren't correct? Well then "guilty as charged" yuk yuk yuk...duuuuuh.