Quote:
Originally posted by tony404
If the same bank ibill is now with ,the one that wants everyone on ibilldirect is the same bank as another processor .Why is that so impossible to believe?
Even the best processor in the whole probably wouldnt tell the minute they got the letter because they would lose a large chunk of their client base and there is a chance they pull thru.
Now I also wouldnt be so quick to blame iBill for the rumor. We are hearing everything second hand.
We have talked about for the longest time the third party processor model is not going to be forever. So why is it put in the same league as Santa Claus lol.
P.S. KimmyKIm you can sit on this jolly fat guys lap any time you want 
|
Didn't I hear you say you'd lost a bunch of weight? ;)
The idea that Merrick, or any other bank for that matter, would tell one client something in regards to another clients banking and finance business is simply
ludicrous, and that's even before we start talking about all the confidentiality and non-disclosure agreements that are standard in such financial relationships.
IF, and its a big IF, IBill were in possession of the knowledge that Merrick was going to stop processing for adult, wouldn't that mean that all the IBill Direct clients were about to be homeless yet again? Since there's no way that Merrick would dump CCBill with their history and volume, and keep a bunch of small-time pornographers on the books...
That just wouldn't make sense, would it ;)