Quote:
Originally posted by CET
Kerry's a politician, it's easy to put any politician in a bad light beacuse politicians make a living off of trying to gain power. Anyone with such aspirations is likely to be a not too good person. He who desires power does not deserve it.
BTW, I'm not a Bush supporter, I'm an independent. IMHO, both Bush and Kerry are worthless individuals and I plan on "wasting my vote" on a 3rd party candidate.
1. We're not talking about Bush, we're talking about Kerry. You're committing what's called a Red Herring Argument.
2. War for oil is old rhetoric with absolutely NO PROOF. It's empty rhetoric, but no one has proved it. If we went to war for oil, it stands to figure that the oil would have been taken, but none of it has been.
|
1. i was just "comparing" bush and kerry.. how the reps try to slap on kerry .. and me, as an european looking at bush what the cowboy is doing.
2. well, ofcourse they will never admit it. but where is the proof that they have been nuclar weapons? or chemicals? those "proves" they had before starting the war, were WRONG..
dont get me wrong.. i dont want to offend you, but i really really cant understand it. war is a bad thing. we had a lot of wars here in our country back some time, and i am happy that i did not live back then.
i think war should only be started if it is really necessary.. and this war, was not necessary at all. Saddam had not a chance, even if he liked too, to attack the US.