02-25-2002, 01:56 AM
|
|
|
Registered User
Join Date: Dec 2001
Posts: 529
|
Quote:
Originally posted by AaronM
(sigh) My poor, poor Charly... What are we going to do with you? I wonder if Lensman is willing to adopt a new policy to ban people who have no fucking clue what they are talking about but pretend that they do?
I would not have the audacity to try to step into the word of magazine content shoots and tell you what is right, wrong, or indifferent. You, on the other hand, enter our world and:
Insult those who know how it works.
Post spam message under fake accounts.
Run fixed contests, based on other people legit contests.
Steal Matrix Contents site design and use it as your own.
Suggest that a $10,000 setup is required for net content.
Make a complete ass of yourself.
The list goes on and on.......
Now, here are 2 photos that have not been retouched one bit. What I have done is taken them down to 300 pixels in width and 25k in size. I took these pictures with a camera that can now be purchased for about $600.00 and I am very happy with the results. I will also mention that I used ZERO (as in the number of replies you got to this thread because nobody takes you seriously) additional light sources other than the flash on my camera.
Now, go ahead and pic apart my work if it will make you feel better but keep in mind that this is for the Internet, not print work.
Do not get me wrong, there is nothing wrong with having high priced equipment and if you look at the front page of my website (Please do not copy the design and use it as your own) you will even see pictures of me shooting with a $10,000.00+ Nikon D1 setup. The D1 is a great camera but WAY overkill for the web.
Wake up and smell the roses. If I were you, I would verify my facts before opening my mouth.
Just one more reality czech brought to you by AaronM.
|
Hey those pics are great, what did you use? |
|
|