GoFuckYourself.com - Adult Webmaster Forum - View Single Post

bhutocracy · 02-24-2002, 05:05 PM

yeah i reread my original post.. i didn't mean to infer you weren't running a classy operation..... my bad.. i had meant to say get a designer to make it *look* more professional.. which i mean.. you can still take offence at, but you'd have to admit it's no http://www.megapartner.com..

i agree the few faults regarding text you saw at eroticfusion were statements of fact and thats fine - i agree with them.. however theres not a lot i can do about them.. i can only guess that he used that grey text on a dark background to make the link to his site unobtrusive.. ? who knows it's not good. and the unaligned banner/button? also not the best.

yeah it's straightforward for an adult webmaster - but is "joe public" going to find it as easy to navigate as www.adultshop.com? as i said you must be making enough money off the link exchanges to not worry about the customers that get spooked.. and thats cool.. but i would have to say even those with a lot of internet use under their belts wouldn't hop inside purely because they wouldn't be sure that theres actually a toy site under all that "geocities 5 years ago". Once again though.. your business, your perogative.. you've got the user logs. you know how many people make it inside.

i am impressed with your full bladder restraint

and I have knocked the condescension on the head

(i don't like pissing at all and it is really one of the only forms i use)
i apologise for the poor wording of my inital post, giving the impression that you weren't professional, all i can say is that it was incredibly late when i wrote it and i thought i had been pretty neutral.. (i mean im hardly going to attack someone im trying to tell to use a designer)
so when you came back at me in a fairly understandable way i took it as you saying "ok bitch now it's ON"

you must be doing something right with your site, otherwise you wouldn't still be doing it, but i've got to say, because i still stand by my earlier non sugar-coated comments, that it doesn't give the **impression** of a cutting edge, slick site regardless of the facts. I won't go on any further as it's needless criticism in a public forum..

02-24-2002, 05:05 PM
bhutocracy Not making A Comeback Industry Role: Join Date: Dec 2001 Posts: 10,218	yeah i reread my original post.. i didn't mean to infer you weren't running a classy operation..... my bad.. i had meant to say get a designer to make it look more professional.. which i mean.. you can still take offence at, but you'd have to admit it's no http://www.megapartner.com.. i agree the few faults regarding text you saw at eroticfusion were statements of fact and thats fine - i agree with them.. however theres not a lot i can do about them.. i can only guess that he used that grey text on a dark background to make the link to his site unobtrusive.. ? who knows it's not good. and the unaligned banner/button? also not the best. yeah it's straightforward for an adult webmaster - but is "joe public" going to find it as easy to navigate as www.adultshop.com? as i said you must be making enough money off the link exchanges to not worry about the customers that get spooked.. and thats cool.. but i would have to say even those with a lot of internet use under their belts wouldn't hop inside purely because they wouldn't be sure that theres actually a toy site under all that "geocities 5 years ago". Once again though.. your business, your perogative.. you've got the user logs. you know how many people make it inside. i am impressed with your full bladder restraint and I have knocked the condescension on the head (i don't like pissing at all and it is really one of the only forms i use) i apologise for the poor wording of my inital post, giving the impression that you weren't professional, all i can say is that it was incredibly late when i wrote it and i thought i had been pretty neutral.. (i mean im hardly going to attack someone im trying to tell to use a designer) so when you came back at me in a fairly understandable way i took it as you saying "ok bitch now it's ON" you must be doing something right with your site, otherwise you wouldn't still be doing it, but i've got to say, because i still stand by my earlier non sugar-coated comments, that it doesn't give the impression of a cutting edge, slick site regardless of the facts. I won't go on any further as it's needless criticism in a public forum.. Last edited by bhutocracy; 02-24-2002 at 05:16 PM..