I don't normally post too much, but hey.
Something has always somewhat bugged me, and I've found it amusing toying with the idea.
Many states (as of last election at least) do *not* tie electoral votes to the popular vote. Yes, that's right. Some fuckhead can change their vote depending on what they wanted to, if they really wanted to be a dick. Even further, those state laws that do tie the vote for the elector are widely thought to be unenforceable and unconstitutional. However, that point is moot considering it's usually an after-the-fact misdeanor and hefty fine - well after the damage is done. (would you buy an electoral vote for $10k if it meant null and voiding say.. 5 million votes?)
This brings up something interesting.. Given the contention and high drama with this election. I'm almost expecting for this to happen in a swing state and for the biggest shitstorm ever to hit.
Just wondering peoples thoughts on this. No one seems to ever mention this, when talking about how the candidates may only be a couple electoral votes apart in the end. What if those two decide to vote opposite the popular vote of the state?
Food for thought is all. My first and last political thread.
-Phil