|
When MPA2 first launched everybody was going on how great the software was. After 6 months of using them people started slating them, what makes NATS different? Are we gonna start to see the same threads in a few months time?
I find it increasingly hard to trust anybody out there with their latest software, as 99% of it is all hyped up on these boards (much like everything) Seems like the only way to really test how great the affiliate software is, would be to actually use it yourself.... but moving over takes time, its a lot of hassle.. Is a move from mpa2/3 worth it?
What is needed is an independent review of both pieces of software on their usability, future expansion, stability etc etc, so then we can make an informed choice, not just a "well Lensman uses it so it must be good" decision......
Lots of companies made their choice to use MPA mostly because of how every fucker out there wouldn't stop going on about how great they are... now suddenly they are crap, always have been and NATS is the only affiliate software you need..
|