I haven't heard any one designer on this thread what kind of statistics-based/semi-scientific method they employ in making design decisions.
--- Who in their right fucking mind is going to spill their secrets to some asshat cock jockey like YOU on this board?!?!?!
The only thing Im getting here is that additional money gets you more time and more experience... which still doesn't answer the fundamental question of (OUTSIDE of random streaks of luck where a design got 1:200 sustained conversions) do you have any method that can be statistically replicated where conversions will fall into a range?
--- Professionals don't rely on LUCK.
I guess the bottom line is that design is and perhaps always will be an EGO- and HYPE-driven issue that skirts away from actual statistics-based analysis.
--- If you analyze my asshole, you'll find a striking resemblance to the driving force behind your person.
Its like saying Jim Bob is a $5K a pop designer cuz he happened to design THREE tours back in the day that hit 1:200 on TGP traffic. The rest of his work since then has been 1:2000 or 1:30K but its OKAY... he's a PROVEN talent.
--- The only thing you have proven in this thread is how little you know about this industry and need to go back to work at McD's.
If that's what we're talking about, wouldn't it make more sense for paysite owners and other holders of capital to invest in cheaper guys hoping to at least pick best of the statistical litter?
--- Yeah, sure man. If you only have 2 cents to rub together, go right ahead and buy shit work. You get what you pay for. I have a strong feeling that you couldn't rub 2 cents together though. Someone so concerned with "cheap" is obviously lacking funds. Which leads me to my question for you... How long have you been in this industry and why aren't you retired yet? I would bet that you are either some jackass newbie who is trying to get insider secrets, or just a general fuckup who couldn't make a dime if he sold gasoline for .02c per gallon.
