Quote:
Originally posted by baddog
Okay . . . first off there is no way that an image is going to give a search result.
If I take a picture of my bike, and someone does a search for Harley-Davidson, that picture is not going to come up.
It is pretty obvious that anyone including BMW in the Meta tags is attempting to get traffic to their porn site by grabbing BMW traffic.
Now, if it is a gallery titled "Czarina shits on a BMW" then okay, but if someone is throwing in BMW in their keywords or alt tags, it is the same thing as someone including Disney.
I can see their point
|
Hi baddog I think the case in this matter is more that you don't want to be sewed for showing brands in your galleries/text/pictures.
And that you should have freedom as a searchengine to show lists on relevance, and if somebody made the effort to make a gallery for a specific query we shall list it, when a relevant search is done, as long as that is possible.