Quote:
Originally posted by TopBucksTrixxxia
The thing that isn't clear to me is when will Voyeurism be distorted for a 'porn producer'
How about this: "when the person is in a state of nudity or engaged in sexual activity and the purpose is to observe or record the person in such a state or activity;"
The whole purpose of production is to record them in this 'sexual' state.......
In this part : "when the observation or recording is done for a sexual purpose" will it ever be distorted to include someone who is filming 'voyeur style' stuff? Or how about appartments or buildings used for this sole type of production - will that cause problems for the producer/production company?
I'm so used to distorted laws coming from the south that I look past the benefits of it and just go for the distorted ways lawmakers/politicians/police can make it come out to look as.
|
simple, don't take pics of naked people without their consent, unless they're naked or whatever outside somewhere. if you have consent this stuff doesn't apply or say if you take pics of people at a nude beach. there's no expectation of privacy at a beach.