|
The thing that isn't clear to me is when will Voyeurism be distorted for a 'porn producer'
How about this: "when the person is in a state of nudity or engaged in sexual activity and the purpose is to observe or record the person in such a state or activity;"
The whole purpose of production is to record them in this 'sexual' state.......
In this part : "when the observation or recording is done for a sexual purpose" will it ever be distorted to include someone who is filming 'voyeur style' stuff? Or how about appartments or buildings used for this sole type of production - will that cause problems for the producer/production company?
I'm so used to distorted laws coming from the south that I look past the benefits of it and just go for the distorted ways lawmakers/politicians/police can make it come out to look as.
|