|
All personal bias aside, I agree with Russert's summary. That there were no real knockouts (definately some points scored, but no TKO), BUT that now we have a pretty clear idea of what each would do/stand for on the subject of the debate (primarily IRAQ and the war on terror).
From that view, Kerry gained, as this was one of the big concerns on the part of a lot of people. I'm not pro Bush, but I knew where he stood. Now I feel I got where Kerry stands articulated clearly.
That's the biggest thing to come out of this, IMHO - two different views on a course of action, pretty clearly stated, which gives swing voters a choice and something to think about.
|