Thread: child porn?
View Single Post
Old 02-04-2002, 02:00 PM  
UnseenWorld
Confirmed User
 
Join Date: May 2001
Location: Portland, OR, USA
Posts: 5,279
Quote:
Originally posted by Dawgy
that is one of the inherent flaws of our government. they are merely trying to define childporn based on content, not on the intention of the photographer.


One can never really know someone's intentions, though, which is why the law is normally based on evidence, not conjecture. Imagine, for example, someone (rather unwisely and misguidedly) running a CP site in order to identify pedophiles for ultimate exposure and prosecution. Sort of a warped approach, but certainly stranger things have happened. There, the intention might be the total opposite of what almost any reasonable person would tend to assume.
__________________
SIG TOO BIG! Maximum 120x60 button and no more than 3 text lines of DEFAULT SIZE and COLOR. Unless your sig is for a GFY top banner sponsor, then you may use a 624x80 instead of a 120x60.
UnseenWorld is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote