Quote:
Originally posted by UnseenWorld
While it's distressing to think someone is appealing to the prurient interest of pedos, it's legally not child "porn" unless there is something inherently sexual about the image: lascivious (not casual) genital display or sexual activity. The guy is still a schmuck, but what he's doing isn't necessarily illegal. The mere nudity of children isn't pornographic, or half the cathedrals in the world (with naked cherubs painted here and there) would have to be spray painted.
|
You must not have kids you asswipe.
This isn't a legal question. The law isn't a watermark for what's right and wrong. Never should be.
CP is so simply wrong, in any form.
Assholes who send e-mails like this are 100 X worse than crack dealers paying for your first couple of "fixes".
RT -