View Single Post
Old 09-27-2004, 10:30 AM  
Furious_Male
Doing the grind since 99
 
Furious_Male's Avatar
 
Industry Role:
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Buffalo NY
Posts: 16,883
Quote:
Originally posted by baddog
See, there you go. I was not criticizing the spelling as much as I was some of the thoughts you put up. Comments like, "That photo shopped blur over the private parts on a tour can still be deemed obscene. That girls nipples could be deemed obscene. With the religous fanatics in office, and on the stand in our courtrooms we will be in deep shit." appeared to be unintelligent.

Those that judge intelligence by a person's ability to convey a thought with proper spelling might use that as an excellent example.

What are you having a hard time comprehending? I was making a point that the judges will have the power of saying what is obscene and not obscene in individual cases. What we may think is not obscene (something as simple as a nipple showing) may still be deemed obscene by the judge. This is the way things are heading under the current administration.

This is a message board. I use it as a brain dump. Honestly I could give a fuck how you or anyone else judges my intelligence based on my postings here.
__________________
Living in Virtual Reality
Contact: Email (preferred): furiousmale .at. gmail - Skype: live:shanedws
Furious_Male is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote