Quote:
Originally posted by WarChild
Okay so you posted it here by mistake? Fair enough.
Can you confirm that statement to be true or false please:
"John Beacock, in a bid to fight against Child Pornography, from time to time surfs websites in search of Child Pornography. John Beacock further agrees that when he is searching for Child Pornography it is soley for reasearch and never for sexual satisfaction or to prey on Children. The one and only time John Beacock posted a direct link to Child Pornography on the website GoFuckYourself.com it was done by mistake and in anger."
True or false?
|
It is false both past and present.
In the past I had used an automated downloading software product called "QuadSucker". From the autodownloads in an unscientific manner - solely by counting up the number of accidentally downloaded CP images I came to the conclusion that .RU was the worst CP distributor offender. I then banned all of Russia (.RU) from obtaining a membership on the domains I owned.
Currently - I ownly download form 2257 compliant suppliers and no longer use QuadSucker. Currently - there is only two suppliers with the guts to handle my type of sexual exploration ... Adult.com and Playboy.com
Both use NATS ... an independent tracking system where adult webmasters are protected from "shaving".