GoFuckYourself.com - Adult Webmaster Forum - View Single Post

Downtime · 09-22-2004, 08:16 PM

Let me pose a thought, hopefully this can garner a decent discussion.

Terrorism lives through the media: TV cameras, newspapers, and the Internet. A terrorist's main objectives all circle around one central theme, which is getting their political message out to the public. Using TV cameras and now the Internet, they behead innocent people and hold hundreds of men, women, and children hostage in public schools. Terrorism needs the media in order for them to survive.

Think of it this way, in America, how does an average joe schmoe get his ass in the news? The reality is that it's nearly impossible; news stations want the juiciest, dirtiest, most moving, and most shocking material they can get their hands on. Joe Schmoe can't provide that. Terrorism can, on the other hand. This brings me to my final point.

Since the blood of terrorism flows through the media of it's host, could we, as the targets, simply ignore them entirely? Theoretically it would confuse the fuck out of them; they wouldn't know what to do. If we, from a media standpoint, worked together so that all our media outlets, Fox News, CNN, BBC, etc, refused to air or even speak of any act of terrorism, wouldn't that stop it altogether? Note that our militaries would still be acting just as strong to kill them off; I only suggest cutting them off completely from a media standpoint.

Both Kerry and Bush believe strongly that terrorism will always be constant, that new terrorists will regroup and keep coming to replace the old ones. I whole-heartedly agree with both of them. What my argument does though, is provide a hope, at least in my mind, that terrorism can be defeated.

An argument isn't an argument unless you talk about the downfalls, however. This path would be extremely hard, especially at the start. Terrorism levels would probably PEAK as soon as they realized what our strategy was. I predict that peak because they'd basically be fighting for their own existence; since they feed of our media. If and when Al Jazeera becomes part of the ComCast basic cable package, I think this has a chance at working.

Hopefully this will get a good discussion going, and try to leave out the bipartisan shit; keep this thing focused.

Discuss!

09-22-2004, 08:16 PM
Downtime Confirmed User Industry Role: Join Date: May 2004 Location: America. Posts: 7,320	How to END Terrorism!!!!!!!! Let me pose a thought, hopefully this can garner a decent discussion. Terrorism lives through the media: TV cameras, newspapers, and the Internet. A terrorist's main objectives all circle around one central theme, which is getting their political message out to the public. Using TV cameras and now the Internet, they behead innocent people and hold hundreds of men, women, and children hostage in public schools. Terrorism needs the media in order for them to survive. Think of it this way, in America, how does an average joe schmoe get his ass in the news? The reality is that it's nearly impossible; news stations want the juiciest, dirtiest, most moving, and most shocking material they can get their hands on. Joe Schmoe can't provide that. Terrorism can, on the other hand. This brings me to my final point. Since the blood of terrorism flows through the media of it's host, could we, as the targets, simply ignore them entirely? Theoretically it would confuse the fuck out of them; they wouldn't know what to do. If we, from a media standpoint, worked together so that all our media outlets, Fox News, CNN, BBC, etc, refused to air or even speak of any act of terrorism, wouldn't that stop it altogether? Note that our militaries would still be acting just as strong to kill them off; I only suggest cutting them off completely from a media standpoint. Both Kerry and Bush believe strongly that terrorism will always be constant, that new terrorists will regroup and keep coming to replace the old ones. I whole-heartedly agree with both of them. What my argument does though, is provide a hope, at least in my mind, that terrorism can be defeated. An argument isn't an argument unless you talk about the downfalls, however. This path would be extremely hard, especially at the start. Terrorism levels would probably PEAK as soon as they realized what our strategy was. I predict that peak because they'd basically be fighting for their own existence; since they feed of our media. If and when Al Jazeera becomes part of the ComCast basic cable package, I think this has a chance at working. Hopefully this will get a good discussion going, and try to leave out the bipartisan shit; keep this thing focused. Discuss! __________________ #27024067