Quote:
Originally posted by HighOnAcid
That's great because your argument was getting tired and long winded real fast. The reason I didn't comment on the 30something other replies defending Kerry's position were pretty much the same thing just worded differently. 
Now I'm going out and spending some of my hard-earned money on myself instead of giving it out to some out of work drug addict 10 kid having welfare receiving food stamp collecting social sponging dreg of society assclown that would have otherwised snatchup up some money I work 60 hours a week for. That's a couple extra drinks for me and my friends! 
|
You actually said, "Seems to be a popular answer."
So 2 against 30 is popular? Just pointing out the flaw in that.
Sorry my argument is so long winded, Ill try to keep it simple for those of you who cannot follow
And for the record, I do not know a single Democrat who supports a welfare system that caters too "out of work drug addict 10 kid having welfare receiving food stamp collecting social sponging dreg of society assclown that would have otherwised snatchup up some money I work 60 hours a week for."
Ya Bush actually changed the welfare reform bill Clinton passed that made this impossible, so you have the Republican asshat to blame for that one. Nobody was looking because, OOo Ya we were busy being attacked by terrorist. Dems believe in SEVER welfare reform, but I am sure the argument and facts are to long winded for you to gain a full understanding of them.
And Have fun tonight!