Quote:
Originally posted by eroswebmaster
No I think what people are saying is that instead of focusing on an impotent leader such as Saddam Hussein, and his country who posed no real threat to the world we should have focused on the countries that did.
Instead we focused on Iraq and are now spreading our military too thin..and we've lost ocntrol of over 50% of the country given up major cities to "insurgents" and created enough hate that allows things like fundamentalism and theocracies to take hold.
|
You are a typical democrat.. good at critizing.. not so good with solutions....
So let me get this straight... You would of preferred to let Saddam alone and continue trading with the likes of the French and etc... So that he can build he WMD aresenal up again to cause more problems then now?
And do what with North Korea? We shuld of invaded them? What do you mean by focus? Like we haven't focused on them... Like they werent part of the Axis of Evil Bush declared in his State of the Union... Did you want us to send our troops there instead?
Ohh and before you argue that there is no proof that Saddam would of built up weapons.. There was no proof he wouldn't either.. and there is proof he had done it before and had no real concern for the world opinion... Maybe you think he had or would have a miraculous turn of agenda like Kerry. I don't know...
But I do know that terrorist are now fighting our soliders in iraq instead of our citizens in nyc... I do know that terrorist are scared of the Iraqi's having their own peaceful self-governing government... This is why terrorist are conecentrating on IRaq right now because it is an important time.. They think they can make the US pull out and then they can control Iraq and its resources... Because once the US is gone the current Iraqi government has no chance against the likes of Al Queda...