Quote:
Originally posted by CraigA
Voted on it based on false information, bad intelliegence and outright lies.
I might have voted for it too based on the cover story they were promoting. You have to assume that the commander in chief is telling the truth, right? And not about some fuckin' blowjob either.
|
fals info? you mean russian intelligence warning of saddam planning attacks on the US or do you mean saddams use and ownership of chemical weapons, or the brittish intelligence about nuclear interest or the discovery of a hidden nuclear program or the UN intelligence stating tons of proscribed weapons unaccounted for?
its gotta suck being a leftist stooge who's only ability is to second guess what the don't have the balls to do.
