Quote:
Originally posted by AaronM
I wouldn't make any such suggestion. My suggest would be for him to STFU if he does not have the proof.
It's really quite simple.
If you can prove it....Go for it.
Have you EVER seen a prosecutor go to the courts with a case and no supporting evidence?
No.
Why not? Because they know they will lose and take a risk of a lawsuit so they never even seek an indictment
|
I have been in the courts for years. There is no such thing as ironclad proof ( see o.j. trial )
I don't think the guy should have stated "SHAVED" he should have merely stated the facts and asked for an explanation if he felt the sponsor was dicking him around.
So far i see no SHAVE or PROOF of shave either, i merely see a bunch of facts. Easily answered by the sponsor.