View Single Post
Old 08-24-2004, 02:49 PM  
FightThisPatent
Confirmed User
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Austin, TX
Posts: 4,090
Quote:
Originally posted by WarChild
What are your thoughts on Canadians and the proposed new 2256 regulations.

Also, if Gallery makers are using sponsor content only, will linking to the sponsors 2257 info be enough? I'm guessing no, because the images are on a new URL now?


Not sure about implications to canadian webmasters... if you host in the US, then there is angle for the need for compliance.

For people building galleries with sponsor "free" content that has been provided to them.... if those images are sexually explicit, and they are hosted on your server, then you have 2257 issues.

I talked to some programs and they are cutting back on the "hardcore" images. No penetration or masturbation means no 2257 requirements, and also maybe better chances of converting if all the previews are "softcore".


-brandon
__________________

http://www.t3report.com
(where's the traffic?) v5.0 is out! |
http://www.FightThePatent.com
| ICQ 52741957
FightThisPatent is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote