Quote:
|
Although CapGemini makes a big noise about being independent from Microsoft, the study was indeed funded by the software firm .
|
[QUOTEThis made my day[/QUOTE]
So Microsoft hires someone to say that they are better
than their competition, and that makes your day?
Most sysadmins in the world speak volumes when they choose
Linux or BSD over Microsoft without having someone PAY
them to say what's best.
You know what's really funny, though?
While CapGemini was paid to say that IIS and Winblows
are better than Apache on Linux, let's take a look at what
software they choose to use for their own web server:
[raymor@raydesk1 ~/sb/extra]$ HEAD
http://www.capgemini.com/
200 OK
Connection: close
Date: Thu, 19 Aug 2004 01:31:37 GMT
Server: Apache
Content-Length: 19241
Content-Type: text/html
Client-Date: Thu, 19 Aug 2004 01:31:37 GMT
Client-Peer: 63.99.237.57:80
Client-Response-Num: 1
We what do you know, Microsoft's paid mouth piece for IIS
runs their own systems on open source software.
Do you like YOUR crow with mustard or ketchup?
__________________
For historical display only. This information is not current:
support@bettercgi.com ICQ 7208627
Strongbox - The next generation in site security
Throttlebox - The next generation in bandwidth control
Clonebox - Backup and disaster recovery on steroids