Quote:
Originally posted by pornstar
No you do a great job of showing us you dont understand how to comprehend simple english.
Its all boils down to a simple question. If you are accusing this man of anything less than having a good site then you are also casting the same stone on lensman and adult.com . ( re teen hitchhikers etc ) and basically every webmaster who makes more than say $20 a month.
Your views that 18 year old porn sites should be labeled "pedo's" doesn't fit with the views of the industry.. PERIOD ( can you understand that or should i break it down for you )
I will put it in simple english for you. ( like the site's plain english that has 2257 regs and the ages of every girl next to the pictures ) how more clear can you get ??
YOU = MORON
|
My god. you really are a fool.
#1. teenhitchhikers.com has girls that look of age and there is no suggestiveness of teenie so how could I be casting a stone at Lensman?
#2. How does every webmaster who makes $20 have anything to do with teenie sites? Are you saying that all webmasters making more that $20 push teenie sites? You are really grasping at straws to prove your point.
#3. I don't care about the 2257 in the site in question. I know they are 18 years of age or older. That is NOT the issue. the issue is that this site is geared towards pedos. Come on... "Little Paris" ?? ... and the tour image alone should clue you into this.
#4. "Your views that 18 year old porn sites should be labeled "pedo's" doesn't fit with the views of the industry"
THAT IS NOT MY VIEW you fucking moron. I NEVER EVER said that AT ALL! Stop twisting shit and only reading what you want to see to make your own case. Don't claim I said shit I didn't say, I won't put up with that shit. Either be truthful and don't lie about me or shut the fuck up. It's that simple..
I never ounce said all 18 year old sites are called "pedos" as you so put it in broken english.. I said sites that sites like this make a big percentage of their profit from pedos and people with pedo-like fantasies.. How hard is that to fucking understand?
#5. You still can't follow basic conversational text. I said the site caters to pedos and you turn around and acuse me of saying all 18 year old sites are pedo's site. How the fuck did that happen? Again, stop reading only what you want to see and stick to facts of what I said.
Debating is one thing guy, but twisting words with no backing or common sense is another thing. if you can't debate and read things at face value then you really should not be communicating with anyone who has opinions that doffer from your own.
Bottom line, this site is perfectly legal and there is no reason to do anything about it as it follows all laws and 2257 regs. However, I have an opinion on sites like this with "little" in the name and tour images implying/posing as/acting as/looking like something other than a grown woman or even a legal teenager on purpose. Again.. IMPLYING... posing as.. looking like on purpose.. . Now for you to say that I think all 18 sites are pedo sites is weak and pathetic because that is NOT what I said.
I am through with this conversation as you can't seem to hold an intelligent and truthful debate without resorting to word twisting and lies.