Quote:
Originally posted by cherrylula
Now that's funny.
Even incomplete scientific evidence as to how we got here is a bit more solid than some bible tale.
I suppose you believe in immaculate conception too? I hope it never happens to me. 
|
It's not incomplete. The 'missing links' are not missing, they don't exist. There is zero evidence that you and I came from apes. People digging around finding bones here and there and coming to the conclusion that they're related is not science. Science is testable and demonstratable. Evolution is a theory and one that doesn't make sense. You and I came from ancestors that were human. Cats were always cats, horses were always horses.
Believing that life began by some big bang of rock and lava, from a single cell, into the variety of life we see today is more if not as absurd as believing an a higher God. Believing in God actually makes more sense. At least there is a beginning. Evolution doesn't explain life, it tries (and fails) to explain how life forms change. Well where did this single cell come from? No answer. At least religion answers this with God.
A scientist once wrote something to affect that, to believe that the breadth of life that we see on Earth came from some chaotic eclipse of random objects and events is so statistically improbable that it brings into question the credibility of scientists that hold such a view. It would be like winning the lottery a thousand times.
I'm an agnostic and I also don't believe Evolution. For some reason, people believe they have to believe one or the other.