Quote:
Originally posted by XPays
iwantchixx- actually google disabling left side links was shocking. the original issue was actually related to google profiting off of adwords clicks sent to sites that were breaking the rules. our client has a valid gripe and you are a little dramatic with the acacia reference. as to who cares if the ads are not legit- come on now. you can send your paris clicks wherever you want! if you use illegal tactics though, then that is on you. nobody says the links have to go to us or our client's video partners. just don't mislead or deceive the surfer and do not steal images or clips.
|
I never said anything about decieving anyone. I agree, if deceptive and a bold faced lie in the serps, then it is an issue to be dealing with google about providing it's actualy google's fault. If it's deceptive ads on the actual site. There is NO reason to go after google about it unless google owns the actual site. Deal with the site owner themselves. It's just that simple. Going after google everytime a copyright holder gets cranky is going to hurt everyone in the long run. it will get to teh point that google will say "ya know, fuck this, lets just shitcan all paris hilton serps". That will hurt more than just people "infringing" and being "deceptive" it will also hurt those who are 100 percent legit and those who are just talking about paris hilton as well as a good chunk of hilton hotel results that have the word paris in them for some reason or another. see what I am saying? it's a downward spiral