Quote:
Originally posted by Aly-Python
As Sleazy has discussed with Joan a few times in the past, ASACP has had to be extremely careful in recent years with who it accepts money from. ........... due to the fact that many of them accept submissions from unknown sources.
|
many paysites have things about them that are questionable - thus the asacp from what I'm told inspects every new paysite applicant for compliance. Why is TGP a blanket bann - different tgps operate differently - not all of them take submissions from unknown sources - and that statement shows much ignorance of the tgp marketplace.
I have never taken free submissions ever - and i think this is the problem - I feel like the asacp is using a defination they don't quite understand and i'm caught up in that.
i told joan initially i could not controll what other people do - and i accpeted being passed on membership cause i thought all members were paysites that had total controll of their content.
when seeing sex.com has membership in the asacp and like me has no controll over their advertisers websites and they make their living as I do linking to other people's websites - and we both require contracts that advertisers have 2257 backed by financial commitment on all advertisers - well that made me think - how am I any different than sex.com and why was I refused and they weren't?
__________________
This dog, is dog, a dog, good dog, way dog, to dog, keep dog, an dog, idiot dog, busy dog, for dog, 20 dog, seconds dog!
Now read without the word dog.
|